![deluge client can not accept incoming connections deluge client can not accept incoming connections](https://linuxmasterclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Deluge.-Adding-a-torrent-file.-Options.png)
Latest handshake: 1 minute, 22 seconds ago Peer: vL2byDvX281fra3Xe9JSTu3CjHypL1UzHNfLPDCkI2A=Įndpoint: "my-external-ISP-ip-address":48221 Transfer: 360.70 KiB received, 103.08 KiB sent Latest handshake: 1 minute, 21 seconds ago Peer: qd+nyR96UNNQXuWqoYhMJ3QBSwhwyBAnaKLOzzNj2xM=Įndpoint: "my-external-ISP-ip-address":48311 Public key: NuHDg0RykQ6hdevLxBaSlCuTuSD1QlxKiG2qmzUZywM= Persistent keepalive: every 25 sudo wg show Transfer: 34.13 MiB received, 66.13 MiB sent Public key: N//AIetJgc6W6AmU24sJeuewB2ZKuJbFX8VqzcbkYjA=Įndpoint:"external-ip-address-of-EC2-node":42840 Persistent keepalive: every 25 $ sudo wg show Transfer: 3.20 KiB received, 6.59 KiB sent Peer: NuHDg0RykQ6hdevLxBaSlCuTuSD1QlxKiG2qmzUZywM=Įndpoint: "external-ip-address-of-EC2-node":42840 Public key: vL2byDvX281fra3Xe9JSTu3CjHypL1UzHNfLPDCkI2A= Here how the configuration of the nodes ~ sudo wg show Can you confirm SSH is listening on 0.0.0.0:22 on both RPi's? (sudo ss -tunlp) Ssh does not work from 100.64.0.101 to 100.64.0.102Īs mentioned in my first message, running an http server on 100.64.0.101 and chatting to it with telnet on 100.64.0.102 (and the other way around) does work.ģ. When using the local addresses, ping and ssh does work in both direcions. What IP are you trying to connect to (i.e., tunnel IP, local subnet IP)? I assume this does not make a difference, or does it? Both RPi's reach out independent to the EC2 node, so I would think it does not matter if they are in the same or different local subnet. Although the final goal is to have the RPi's in different local subnets, for practical reasons the testing is now in the same subnet. Are the two RPi's on the same local subnet? # make sure lan zone has wg0 and lan interfaces attachedįirst of al thanks for your help! i have the feeling that i'm very close to get this working but I can't figure out what i'm missing.ġ. # Change below accordingly if you want everything to go through the tunnel # Allow traffic from OpenWRT client to VPN lan If host A is OpenWRT router, you can follow these steps (adapted from ) opkg updateĬat wgclient.key | wg pubkey > wgclient.pub Make sure WireGuard is running on both HOSTS A and B, and then on the smartphone (HOST C), after connecting to HOST B with WireGuard you should be able to ping 10.200.200.5. Like we did with Host A, IP forwarding must also be enabled on Host B: $ sysctl _forward=1 # packets destined for the HOST 'A' subnet. without this part, WireGuard will drop the # This is the peer that is on the private subnet that we want to access. PostDown = iptables -D FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -o ens3 -j MASQUERADE PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ens3 -j MASQUERADE # iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADEįinally, we need to make sure IP forwarding is enabled in Host A's kernel: $ sysctl _forward=1 Here's what we need to add to Host A's iptables rules, expressed as the commands you would use to ADD them: # iptables -A FORWARD -i wg0-client -j ACCEPT PersistentKeepalive = 25 # to keep connections alive across NAT ListenPort = 27836 # optional will be randomly assigned otherwiseĭNS = 1.1.1.1 # or your own DNS server if you're running one They all have WireGuard installed.Ī the Linux machine on the local subnet, behind the NAT/firewallī the Linux cloud server ( VPS, like an Amazon EC2 instance)Ĭ a third WireGuard client a smartphone in this example Host 'A' Working Exampleįirst let's define our three hosts. We'll create a site-to-site connection with WireGuard allowing us to access the local subnet on a remote device (smartphone, in this example) by connecting through a cloud server in the middle. Outgoing connections work, but all incoming connections get DROPPED by the ISP's routing policy. We want to access a local subnet remotely, but it is behind a NAT firewall and we can't setup port forwarding.
![deluge client can not accept incoming connections deluge client can not accept incoming connections](https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/Manual/Deluge?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=deluge_connection_manager.png)
Accessing a subnet that is behind a WireGuard client using a site-to-site setup Problem Summary